The Civic Node

Russia Targeted Killings Campaign

5 min read

Definition

A post-2022 escalation in Russian-state-authorized targeted killings of perceived enemies on European soil, characterized by:

  1. Doctrinal pivot from state-direct to proxy-recruited execution — driven by the 2018 post-Skripal expulsion of hundreds of Russian diplomats/spies from Western capitals, which collapsed the operating space for state-employed Russian intelligence officers in Europe;
  2. Category-shift in targeting — historic targeting of military defectors expanded to include Russian rights activists abroad, foreign supporters of Ukraine, and contested-loyalty diaspora activists (e.g., Bashkortostan independence advocates);
  3. Embedding within a broader hybrid-warfare campaign — AP has mapped 191 acts of sabotage, arson, and disruption linked to Russia across Europe since 2022, often using overlapping proxy networks (organized crime, criminal-history recruits, coerced ex-defectors).

Three Western intelligence officials (different countries, all anonymous to AP) characterize the campaign as politically authorized at the Kremlin level: “This campaign is not by accident or chance. There is political authorization.”

Why It Matters for the Newsletter

This concept operates at the intersection of three newsletter themes the wiki has been tracking separately:

  • Power: state authorization for political violence outside the state’s territory, executed through non-state proxies — a structural cousin of the IRGC tollbooth in Hormuz (state directing non-state armed actors to extract value from international shipping) and the Wagner Group model.
  • Politics: the targeting category-shift to foreign Ukraine supporters and Russian dissidents abroad extends the legitimate-target zone Russia operates within, normalizing extraterritorial repression in a way that erodes the post-Cold-War norms protecting dissidents-in-exile.
  • Infrastructure: 191 sabotage/arson acts across Europe is infrastructure-warfare against Western support-of-Ukraine logistics — the kinetic counterpart to the financial sanctions/dedollarization theater.

The concept’s structural insight for newsletter use is “state capacity through proxies”: when sanctions/expulsions eliminate state-direct capacity, states adopt proxy-and-platform models that look less like conventional state action and more like organized-crime-with-state-authorization. The same pattern produces the IRGC’s Hormuz tolls, Wagner’s African operations, and now Russia’s European assassination campaign. Differentiating state action from state-authorized non-state action becomes the structural question of 2020s-onward geopolitics.

Evidence & Examples

  • France — Vladimir Osechkin (April 2025 plot): 4-man Russian crew (all from Dagestan) staked out his Biarritz home, photographing/filming as suspected groundwork for assassination. Osechkin runs a rights group exposing Russian prison abuses; under French police protection since 2022. (Russia Targeted Killings Europe Ramping Up — AP via ABC News - 2026-05-07)
  • Lithuania — Ruslan Gabbasov (Feb 2025): Bashkortostan independence activist; discovered Apple AirTag tracker on his car; Lithuanian authorities later detained a “killer with a gun” waiting near his home overnight. Gabbasov declined witness-protection identity-change.
  • Lithuania — Valdas Bartkevičius (March 2025): Lithuanian Ukraine-supporter (notably anti-Russian acts include urinating on a Russian war memorial); authorities discovered mailbox-bomb plot.
  • Germany: plot against head of Rheinmetall (German weapons supplier to Ukraine); plot against a Ukrainian military official.
  • Poland (2024): arrest of man in alleged plot to assassinate Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
  • Spain (2024): Russian helicopter pilot defector Maxim Kuzminov killed; Russian operatives prime suspects. Russian state TV had pre-televised threats against him.
  • Lithuanian prosecutorial scope: 13 people charged from at least 7 countries; some directly ordered by Russian military intelligence (GRU); some with connections to Russian organized crime. At least 20 detained/charged/identified across Europe in past year.
  • Doctrinal pivot point — Skripal (2018): Sergei Skripal poisoned with nerve agent in Salisbury, England; UK identified attack as carried out by Russian military intelligence officers; Britain + allies expelled hundreds of Russian diplomats/spies, collapsing state-direct operating capacity.

Tensions & Counterarguments

  • Russian denial: Putin spokesperson Peskov “doesn’t see any need” to comment; Moscow has historically denied involvement.
  • Proxy success rate: Cmdr. Dominic Murphy (retired UK Met Police counterterror) suggests most publicly-disclosed plots have been foiled — proxy capability appears lower than state-direct. The success-rate counterargument has limits: (a) the threat itself produces silencing effect on targeted dissidents (Gabbasov: “they could kill me… or I could hide”); (b) the plots tie up European law-enforcement resources at scale; (c) a single successful plot (Kuzminov in Spain) demonstrates the model’s residual capability.
  • U.S. exposure: AP’s reporting is European-focused. The wiki has no comparable U.S.-based investigative reporting on whether the campaign extends to North America. Open question.
  • Hybrid Warfare (deferred concept) — the broader category of which targeted killings are the kinetic apex
  • Transnational Repression (deferred concept) — the supranational form of state-against-dissident extension
  • Authoritarian Drift — the macro-frame; Russia is the doctrinal upper bound of where Western states are not (yet)
  • Institutional Capture — adjacent but distinct; targeted killings are operational, not institutional
  • Cantillon Effect — adjacent: when state capacity is forced through non-state intermediaries, the discretionary first-receivers become organized-crime networks rather than the state’s own apparatus

Key Sources

Open Questions

  • Does the campaign extend to North American soil? AP’s reporting does not address this; no comparable U.S. investigative source on the wiki yet.
  • What is the operational interface between the state-authorized assassination crews and the 191-incident sabotage/arson campaign — same handlers, same recruitment networks, or distinct chains?
  • Is there a Western counter-doctrine being developed (proactive disruption of proxy networks, dissident-protection programs at scale, or formal categorization of state-authorized proxy violence under international law)?
  • How is this affecting European insurance, security, and immigration policy for Russian diaspora dissidents — which countries are still safe to grant asylum?

Graph View

Backlinks