Original source

Summary

PBS NewsHour column (reprinted from The Conversation) written shortly after Paul Volcker’s death, arguing that his most important legacy was establishing the principle of an independent Federal Reserve — not just breaking the 1970s inflation. Written when Trump I was attacking Powell; reads as prophetic given Trump II’s even more aggressive campaign.

Key Points

  • Volcker became Fed chair in August 1979 when inflation was accelerating toward 13%.
  • Burns (Fed 1970-78) ignited inflation by keeping rates low to help Nixon win 1972 — inflation rose from 3.2% (end of 1972) to 11% by 1975.
  • Volcker raised rates to nearly 20% in 1980 — caused deepest recession since the 1930s.
  • Politicians attacked Volcker; home builders sent unused 2x4s to the Fed; farmers drove tractors around HQ.
  • In 1984, Reagan’s chief of staff secretly ordered Volcker not to raise rates before the election — Volcker complied that time.
  • Inflation fell below 4% in 1983; recovery followed.
  • Article argues: just as we want judges to decide on law not politics, central bankers must steer free of political pressures.
  • Written when Trump I was “relentlessly and very publicly attacking” Powell — parallels to current situation are explicit.

Newsletter Angles

  • The historical pattern is almost identical to the Trump II situation: president demands rate cuts, cites economic growth/debt concerns, attacks Fed chair personally.
  • Volcker’s 1984 capitulation (not raising rates before election) shows that even the most independent Fed chairs have limits. Powell will face the same test.
  • The Burns-Nixon story is the cautionary tale. Burns is “the worst Fed chair in history” precisely because he put political loyalty above economic responsibility. The lasting damage wasn’t just inflation — it was the 1970s stagflation that defined a generation.

Entities Mentioned

Concepts Mentioned

Notes

Authored by an academic economist (Michael W Klein, Fletcher School, Tufts). Written in 2019 — before Trump II’s even more aggressive campaign. Reads as prescient. Excellent historical grounding for any piece on the Fed-White House conflict.