Summary

PBS NewsHour column (reprinted from The Conversation) written shortly after Paul Volcker’s death, arguing that his most important legacy was establishing the principle of an independent Federal Reserve — not just breaking the 1970s inflation. Written when Trump I was attacking Powell; reads as prophetic given Trump II’s even more aggressive campaign.

Key Points

  • Volcker became Fed chair in August 1979 when inflation was accelerating toward 13%.
  • Burns (Fed 1970-78) ignited inflation by keeping rates low to help Nixon win 1972 — inflation rose from 3.2% (end of 1972) to 11% by 1975.
  • Volcker raised rates to nearly 20% in 1980 — caused deepest recession since the 1930s.
  • Politicians attacked Volcker; home builders sent unused 2x4s to the Fed; farmers drove tractors around HQ.
  • In 1984, Reagan’s chief of staff secretly ordered Volcker not to raise rates before the election — Volcker complied that time.
  • Inflation fell below 4% in 1983; recovery followed.
  • Article argues: just as we want judges to decide on law not politics, central bankers must steer free of political pressures.
  • Written when Trump I was “relentlessly and very publicly attacking” Powell — parallels to current situation are explicit.

Newsletter Angles

  • The historical pattern is almost identical to the Trump II situation: president demands rate cuts, cites economic growth/debt concerns, attacks Fed chair personally.
  • Volcker’s 1984 capitulation (not raising rates before election) shows that even the most independent Fed chairs have limits. Powell will face the same test.
  • The Burns-Nixon story is the cautionary tale. Burns is “the worst Fed chair in history” precisely because he put political loyalty above economic responsibility. The lasting damage wasn’t just inflation — it was the 1970s stagflation that defined a generation.

Entities Mentioned

Concepts Mentioned

Notes

Authored by an academic economist (Michael W Klein, Fletcher School, Tufts). Written in 2019 — before Trump II’s even more aggressive campaign. Reads as prescient. Excellent historical grounding for any piece on the Fed-White House conflict.